B 9 <hacke...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > Steve Izma <si...@golden.net> wrote: > Since you had such excellent suggestions, I'd like your advice about > something I've noticed: printed materials often omit the protocol when > it is "https://"; or "http://";. That makes sense to me and I am > inclined to change the way the .URL macro in the WWW package works so > it does the same (when no link text is specified). > > For example, > > .URL https://foo.bar.com/fred/juki/ > > would be displayed (in PDF, HTML, and nroff) as simply > > foo.bar.com/fred/juki/ > > Steve, what do you think of this practice? > > Everyone: Would anyone object if .URL used this strategy for cleaner > typesetting?
Please don't do this: there are still web sites out there that only respond to www.website.tld and not to website.tld. -- T. Kurt Bond, tkurtb...@gmail.com
