Could someone please explain to me in plain words what I will gain from doing it in the suggested way in stead of the why I had done it in the source that I posted??
tir. 12. nov. 2019 05.38 skrev Steve Izma <si...@golden.net>: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:18:31AM +0100, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote: > > Subject: Re: Meeting Minute > > > > > > > \l'\n(.l/1m' > > > > > > \l'\n[.l]u' > > > > I think what should be considered here is that groff only does > > integer arithmetic. Therefore, in the first case the length > > of the line will get truncated to an integer number of ems, > > whereas in the second case the length of the line will match > > the width of filled text lines as closely as possible within > > the limits of the device resolution. Thus I suggest that > > the second way is generally preferable. > > Very good point. > > -- Steve > > -- > Steve Izma > - > Home: 35 Locust St., Kitchener, Ontario, Canada N2H 1W6 > E-mail: si...@golden.net phone: 519-745-1313 cell: 519-998-2684 > > == > I have always felt the necessity to verify what to many seemed a > simple multiplication table. > -- Ilya Ehrenburg (Soviet author and critic; he's not > talking about mathematics) > >
