Hi Ralph, Ralph Corderoy wrote on Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 10:34:32AM +0000:
> Other macro sets in that same section of groff_tmac(5) are installed, > and there's no indication that ptx is special and not installed. > I see no reason for it to not be installed and think this is a bug. > Do you agree? If so, I'll open an issue. Maybe it wasn't installed because the groff distribution does not include the ptx(1) program - then again, it's in coreutils, so most GNU/Linux systems probably already have it, and for others, it is easy to install. I think you are right that installing it would be an improvement. The only downside i could think of would be namespace pollution - but the name "ptx" feels distinctive enough to make that a very minor issue if indeed it is any issue at all. So your plan sounds good to me. Yours, Ingo
