On Friday, February 8, 2019 9:38 PM, Jeff Conrad wrote
> I discussed this with Doug Kerr, one of the authors (and the principal
> editor) of X3.4-1967. He assures me that accent grave was coded at
> 0x60; the intent was to provide the *option* to use 0x60 and 0x27 for
> opening and closing quotes,
Upon further thought, and careful re-reading of X3.4-1986 and Fred
Smith’s November 1967 article in Western Union Technical Review, I’m not
sure I correctly interpreted Doug’s comments, so I’ve asked for a
clarification. I shall apprise of what I find out.
It does appear that any encoding predating ISO 646 is potentially
ambiguous. If that’s the case,
“traditional” ≡ ambiguous
and perhaps
“modern” ≡ unambiguous
Of course, then “traditional” is impossible to define because we don’t
know which of several possibilities it represents, and any “traditional”
coding is no more than a crapshoot—essentially, ‘-Tascii’ was always
device dependent.
I think there are only two reasonable renderings: true opening and
closing quotes (iffy even with “traditional” encoding), and neutral
apostrophes for opening and closing. The latter seems the best with
most current non–UTF 8 devices, and is arguably at least safe with most
older devices (though I suppose there could be problems with devices
that render 0x27 as accent acute).
Jeff
