Hi Ingo, > > > To confirm this, i just commented out the line > > > > > > double hypot(double, double); > > > > > > in /usr/include/math.h ... > > > The lack of hypot() in libm is *not* detected > > > Did you remove hypot() from libm.a too? > > No i didn't. ... > Then, the test that the gnulib hypot module is supposed to replace > intends to test whether the function needs to be *declared*.
Ah, OK. The `lack of hypot() in libm', rather than <math.h>, made me ask. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
