At 2018-06-19T13:02:27+0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Branden, > > You didn't alter this aspect, but... > > > +o PDFPIC has been corrected so the behaviour is the same whether you use > > the > > + postscript or pdf drivers. However, this means that any documents which > > + were written using the old behaviour will not be rendered correctly if > > + using the pdf driver with the new version. > > ...that looks because it's either talking about the output devices `ps', > not `postscript', and `pdf', or PostScript and PDF. groff tends to talk > about `device driver' or `device' rather than `driver'. But I support > it's only `NEWS' rather than more main documentation.
I'm not 100% sure I understand you. Let me recast. You're saying that either: 1. This item is referring in a generic way to "drivers" for the PostScript and PDF file formats and therefore should case them appropriately; or 2. This item is referring to groff's "ps" and "pdf" output devices (also known as arguments to the -T option) and should therefore use these option arguments as they would appear in a command line. ...right? -- Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
