I wrote:
        > > >>   const char *foo;
        > > >>   char const *foo;
        > 
        > No, those two have identical meaning.

        Not according to:
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Const_(computer_programming)
                              :
                              :

I was wrong.  Those two lines _are_ identical.
The example code I lifted even illustrated that.

        const int *ptrToConst;     //identical to: int const *ptrToConst,

My apologies to [groff].

((more to come))

-- 
 Mike Bianchi

Reply via email to