I wrote:
> > >> const char *foo;
> > >> char const *foo;
>
> No, those two have identical meaning.
Not according to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Const_(computer_programming)
:
:
I was wrong. Those two lines _are_ identical.
The example code I lifted even illustrated that.
const int *ptrToConst; //identical to: int const *ptrToConst,
My apologies to [groff].
((more to come))
--
Mike Bianchi
