> Ralph Corderoy <ra...@inputplus.co.uk> hat am 6. Mai 2018 um 00:03 > geschrieben:
> Just to make certain we're arguing about the same thing, I'm talking C > here, not C++. I've no idea whether C++ is the same or different in > this respect, and don't wish to learn. :-) As said the same applies for C++. "const int *" is identical to "int const *", both is a pointer to constant ints. To get a constant pointer you need to write "* const".
