On Sun, Nov 26, 2017, Ulrich Lauther wrote: > why do we have to use "ROMAN<n>" and not "ROMAN <n>", which would be easier > to process? > Historical reasons?
Yep. :) Truth is, I wrote the macro so long ago that I can't recall what advantage I saw in postfixing the digit. As a user, do you see an advantage to making the second form available, too? If so, it's a no-brainer to implement. I can take care of it before pushing your patch. -- Peter Schaffter http://www.schaffter.ca
