Steve Izma <st...@nestor.wlu.ca> wrote: |On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:28:05PM +0100, Carsten Kunze wrote: |> Subject: Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons |> |> But why not as a first step keep the old syntax and make & a |> real AND and : ar real OR so that |> |> .if (\\n(AB>5:"\\$1"foo")&(!\\n(.$=2) ... |> |> is possible? | |This is something I'd really like to see. As far as I know, at |this point such an expression can be numerical only.
Yes, this entire thing is not handled by .if but in fact passed down to get_number() which then works it all out by itself. --steffen
