Hi all, > On Wed, Oct 08 2014 at 11:34:26 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> Also, how will we proceed when we will consider that this automake >>> migration is ready for merge into master? The normal process would >>> be to squash all the commits into a single one on master, but given >>> the high number of files impacted, it might be better to have all >>> the commits into master? In this case should I need to add a entry >>> in ChangeLog per commit on automake3? >> >> IMHO, your changes are too large for a detailed ChangeLog entry. >> Instead, I recommend that you simply merge your branch back into >> master, leaving your single commits intact. The merge should be >> accompanied with a ChangeLog entry that gives an overview of what the >> commits in the branch do. > > OK, I'll tell you when automake3 is ready.
I've just fully rebased `automake3', and I think it is nearly ready to be merged into master. A few things to do: - I still need to write and commit a ChangeLog entry. Because automake3 was rebased there will be no merge commit when I'll merge it into master so I need to commit it on automake3 first. - An entry in `NEWS' should also be added. - I've written a short explanation of the use of automake in doc/automake.mom that is not automatically generated. Regards, -- Bertrand Garrigues
