Tadziu Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote:
|>> Should nroff render `` '' as typographical double quotes
|>> instead of literal ASCII values?
|>
|> wanted ... well, that is precisely why we have more expressive
|> input notations, such as \(oq, \(cq, \(lq, and \(rq, (for
|
|I agree. Also, it can't do this easily if it reads them as
|separate input characters, unless we generalize the ligature
|mechanism (like in TeX) to recognize sequences other than the
|five "f"-combinations hardcoded into groff.
While i agree with you in that i think the input side can and
should be improved, really lazy and rude people even quarrel(ed)
with TeX:
\catxy{"}{11}% disable "easy quotation mark support".
..
% automatic double-quotation "support"
\edef\dblQuotaAreOpen{\FALSE}%
..
% Easy-Quotation-Mark-Support
\catxy{"}{13}%
\def"{%
\relax%
\ifnum\dblQuotaAreOpen=\TRUE %
''\xdef\dblQuotaAreOpen{\FALSE}%
\else%
``\xdef\dblQuotaAreOpen{\TRUE}%
\fi%
}
..
[ff. in "after paragraph" hook]
% is there an open double quotation mark?? Assumed to be an error!
\ifnum\dblQuotaAreOpen=\TRUE %
\@error{1}{Open double-quotation at end of par!^^J%
(I will unset the error to avoid hundreds of these msgs!!!)}%
\xdef\dblQuotaAreOpen{\FALSE}%
\fi\relax%
That is "easy" as in "american-style" ;}
--steffen
