Hello, FYI,

i have found a double-delete bug, introduced in the very first
changeset of that topic.  Yet that should be it, damn.
The patch below is against [master]

 |I don't have time to review this.  I suggest that you open an
 |bugtracker issue and post a cleaned-up mbox file for further
 |inspection.

Oh yes, it is in sync, against all the odds.

--steffen
commit 889d681
Author: Steffen Nurpmeso <sdao...@users.sf.net>
Date:   2014-10-09 14:28:24 +0200

    file_case: fix double delete..
    
    Introduced in the very beginning (Encapsulate searchpath:: FILE*'s
    in new class file_case), this commit fixes a double delete
    (ownership of object overtaken by the also constructed iterator
    object, but nonetheless deleted by creator of both).
---
 src/roff/troff/input.cpp | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/roff/troff/input.cpp b/src/roff/troff/input.cpp
index cae330c..5853157 100644
--- a/src/roff/troff/input.cpp
+++ b/src/roff/troff/input.cpp
@@ -803,10 +803,9 @@ void next_file()
   else {
     file_case *fcp = include_search_path.open_file_cautious(nm.contents(),
         fcp->fc_const_path);
-    if (fcp != NULL) {
+    if (fcp != NULL)
       input_stack::next_file(fcp, nm.contents());
-      delete fcp;
-    } else
+    else
       error("can't open `%1': %2", nm.contents(), strerror(errno));
   }
   tok.next();

Reply via email to