>> Both files `groff.man' as `groff.1n' and `groff.7n' as source and as >> `groff.1' and `groff.7' after compiling. > > The "compiling" is the substitution of `@g@', for example? Why not > groff.1.in, echoing Makefile.in and friends that also under go > simple substitution, producing groff.1?
... and I like this even more, since it is natural within the
autotools infrastructure :-) Anyways, an issue in the tracker would be
good.
Werner
