Should we be worried about having too few characters left though? Do we need to work on a solution?
- Vaibhaw On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> A `groff' option for running the `gideal' preprocessor is needed. > > > > Only once the preprocessor has a significant enough audience to make > > it worthwhile? Meanwhile, it can continue to be explicitly > > pipelined? > > Given that `ideal' is a traditional preprocessor, I think it is a good > thing to assign a shortcut. > > > Werner > >
