Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote (Fri, 28 Mar 2014 06:44:19 +0100 (CET)): > Well, *if* someone is going to implement a better line breaking > algorithm, it should be the best available, and not a compromise. > Changes are necessary in any case...
A clear word for mission statement. BTW. > > Like Doug, I smell an increase in complexity that runs counter to > > simplicity, flexibility, and portability. What about introducing a diversion (or environment), for the only purpose of paragraph-at-once, inkl. diversion specific requests, while inheriting only non line-at-once groff settings. That might also handle border contours (line lengths determined by a non vertical line border). Being a object oriented approach in programming and modular in using.
