Hi Ingo,
> > > Ordering is 'logical' ("Spock").
> >
> > As is topological ordering by dependency if that's what's need to
> > make it work consistently. :-)
>
> In a properly written Makefile, yes, sure, that would be the canonical
> idea.
I actually meant by doing:
> In some places, the build system relies on the order of
> directories/files in list variables to enforce the required build
> order. If i remember correctly (and the comments in the Makefile
> itself are correct), this is one of the places.
Sorry for the lack of clarity. My point was, alphabetical isn't the
only `logical' ordering. :-)
Cheers, Ralph.
