Am Sonntag 28 Juli 2013, 22:24:03 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > > > If I code the text with \[u u030A] I expect it to be in the PDF. > > This glyph is only contained in the URW fonts. For example, try this > with the PDF backend: > > .fam U-T > uring: \[u u030A] > > > Werner
Thanks Werner
I now use -Tpdf and "Latin small letter u with ring above"
and most others work.
I still have sometimes problems with the special glyphs.
It seems that it depends on the order they are called.
At the moment I'm not able to reproduce it clearly with a small example.
Attached is a part of the generated PDF (as png, it is smaller)
and the generated HTML.
The word is written as groff test "\[vs]\[n ah]\[u016F]ra"
As said it does work mostly, but not always.
And it happens, whether i use \[u u030A] or \[u016F].
best regards
Heinz<<attachment: pdf.png>>
<<attachment: html.png>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
