I'll be very interested to see how you do this, as I would like to use some extended maths fonts I have available. Denis
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:24:20 +0530 Shiv Shankar Dayal <shivshankar.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > > > > I have initial success in doing this and I hope to complete this > > > soon. However, I would love to understand how mathematical > > > capabilities of groff can be made as good as that of latex. > > > > Can you be more explicit? What are you missing, what would you like > > to see? In general, while groff's eqn preprocessor has implemented > > a lot of TeX's mathematical capabilities, you will never have the > > same level of automatic positioning as with TeX. > > > > > Let us say at least all the symbols available in TeX. Is it not > possible to enhance eqn to match TeX. The obstacle will be human than > technical in my opinion. > > Also, I will send the map and font files along with sample pdf for > verification > to list in three four days for AMSMath fonts. > > > > > Also, how can I do syntax highlighting? Should I write custom > > > scripts to format my piece of code? > > > > Syntax highlighting on the input or the output side? > > > > > > Werner > > > > On the output side. I guess I can write a Python script which can be > invoked along with Pygments to output code to produce colorized > output in PS/DVI. > -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
