I regard the following behaviour of grog, which has been there from the beginning, to be wrong:
On the input files a.n: .EQ .so /dev/null .EN b.n: .so a.n the following commands give the indicated results: grog a.n: groff a.n [missing -se] grog b.n: groff b.n [missing -se] With the shell version of grog the results are: grog a.n: groff -e a. [missing -s] grog b.n: groff -se b.n [correct] Do people agree? I find it a nuisance as I frequently generate the contents of tables and other things by an external means. I've sent a simple patch of the shell version. Denis -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
