> Under what circumstances would a diversion that ends on the bottom
> line of a page spring a footer trap even when the diversion has been
> chopped?
The end of document handling in groff is handled specially in the
C++ source; maybe there's a bug.
> If anyone can come up with a reason (or several reasons), I may be
> able to track down the source of the problem and then be more
> precise in asking for help if I can't fix it myself. As it is, I'm
> stymied.
As usual, please provide a small snippet which demonstrates the
problematic behaviour.
And sorry for not having time yet to examine your `refer' problem.
Werner
