On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:42:41PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Either way, groff is enough better that I wouldn't look back. > > It might be interesting to compare with heirloom troff which has > native support for OpenType fonts, and which supports almost all of > the groff extensions.
Yeah, that would make a lot more sense. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
