> Shouldn't this really do > > a ] ) ; b ] ) ; c]); > > since <TAB>-separated lines are supposed to behave like columnar real > lines and only the closing terms are adjusted?
(Answering myself with more possibilities.) Either that or a]); b]); c]); if we're to assume that `It' opens a macro context with macro behaviour versus just sucking down the whitespace a la free-form text. I suppose this would be more consistent if the <TAB>-separated list is introduced with a macro, such as .It Fl a ] ) ;<TAB>b ] ) ;<TAB>c ] ) ; Right now, these produce the same results less the Fl effects.
