> I remember being daunted when I first approached the issue of
> underscoring text. For such a basic typesetting function, it seemed
> horribly kludgy to implement, especially since there are those
> tantalizing .ul and .cu requests for TTY output.
Unfortunately, .cu doesn't work reliably if you use it continuously
for more than a single line. I don't know whether this can be fixed.
> I don't suppose there's any chance of underlining for the PostScript
> device being implemented in groff itself, is there? Sure would make
> things a lot easier.
Please make suggestions how this could work. I need a solution which
can be implemented for all devices (which are capable to do so), not
PS only.
Werner
