On 19-Jun-09 22:06:49, Keith Marshall wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Friday 19 June 2009 23:22:38 smo...@sacredlabor.com wrote:
>> I have an occasion where '...' is the first set of chars on a
>> line. _How do I rightly escape the first . so it does not get
>> translated as a macro '.' named '..' ?
>
> You could write it as
>
> \&...
You could also define a character called say \[el] ("ellipsis",
i.e. three dots on the baseline). This could be as simple as
.char \[el] ...
or you might prefer to play with the spacings to get a better
effect, such as
.char \[el] .\h'0.1n'.\h'0.1n'.\h'0.1n'
which (I think) looks better than just "...". Then you don't need
to bother about remembering the "\&" if it's at the start of a line.
You may also want to pad it with some space on either side (you
can use \h'X' for this, where "X" is a distance like 0.1n).
Note that the effect depends on the font. In particular, in a
fixed-width font (like Courier Roman, \f[CR]), your "..." will
come out with each dot spaced on by the fixed width of a character,
and will look bad. In that case moving the dots closer together,
as in
.char \[el] .\h'-0.25n'.\h'-0.25n'.
would produce a better result.
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 19-Jun-09 Time: 23:47:45
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
