> My point was not "compatibility over all" but "do not break
> existing scripts". The .em case is just an example,

I'm quite sure that this change won't break any scripts if they have
relied on the groff documentation.

> I'd also hoped for upward compatibility as newer versions of groff
> appeared, but this has not happened; I've spent much time fixing
> formerly working material.

Please elaborate.


    Werner


Reply via email to