Hi Zvezdan, > I did not use bzr, but based on information I've seen, these are not > "undefended assertions". See, for example, > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0374/#tests-impressions > > Those numbers look bad to me, and the only indication to the contrary > is that version 1.9 "should" bring the numbers down. A "should" is > probably not good enough next to two competitors that already have > numbers to show.
He says he's testing bzr 1.5. It's now at version 1.12. > The Mozilla project had similar benchmarking experience. > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/preed/2007/04/version_control_system_shootou_1.html Timing results from April 2007? It says "We did most of these tests with the bzr version available at the time, 0.14" It's known and accepted that bzr's performance compared badly amongst its peers in the past. But pointing back to old results doesn't give us much information about how it is *now*. And personally, I don't find its performance a chore. Cheers, Ralph.
