To me it is perfectly natural that
line from 1,1 then up 1
is different from
line then up 1
In the first case, there is a very clear intuitive specification of a path
that starts at 1,1 and then goes up 1 -- it is not ambiguous.
In the second case, there is no clear specification of where
the path starts. "line then up 1" has a natural interpretation of
"do something (line) and *then* up 1".
Hence, the current behavior for the second case
makes sense but the current behavior for the first case does
not make sense.
----------------------------------------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
> Uh, oh. It seems that I have to revert or modify the change. Anyway,
> it looks strange to me that
>
> right;
> line from 1,1 then up 1
>
> (which is, according to your tests with AT&T pic, the same as `line 0
> from 1,1 then up 1') should be have in a different way compared to
>
> right;
> line then up 1;
>
> (which is the same as `line right then up 1').
>
> Am I doing something wrong? Opinions?
>
>
> Werner
_________________________________________________________________
Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!
http://biggestloser.msn.com/
