Larry Kollar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This I don't understand.  Ugly to read for whom?  If w is chosen well 
> > for the indent and point size, it will look as though the table was 
> > filled to right margin by a smart algorithm.
> 
> What might work for nroff might not work for troff -- and then there are 
> things like -rS11 for people who want a little larger type.

I see your point.

> You might want to have a look at groff_ms(7). I put a lot of effort
> into making those tables work well for both console & print, and
> didn't use w at all.

I'll do that.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>


Reply via email to