Gaius Mulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I suspect the .SCRIPT-INPUT-BEGIN .SCRIPT-INPUT-END could be
> implemented as macros which map onto a similar escape technique as the
> suppression escapes \O etc. In any event the obvious advantage to
> this approach is that one can harness the ability of a scripting
> language to manipulate raw text rather than fight .tr et al and
> diversions. It would also mean one could distribute filters hidden
> inside macro sets. Potentially with mechanisms such as swig it might
> be possible for, say Python to import more runtime information from
> the troff parent. Which would be fun - and _might_ enable easier
> experimentation with micro typography to take place, possibly. Or you
> could include the knights tour program inside the troff source.
>
> Of course this could all be regarded as several steps too far :-)
I like it. But it's overkill for chess typetting; with a font consisting
of 25 constant-width piece-on-square images you could do .CS/.CE with
two trivial macros, .CS being a wrapper arounfd a .tr statement.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
