I personally use groff for PDF and PostScript documents, so I did not care for grohtml too much. The recent discussion about doclifter prompted me to recheck, and it seems to be a little -ms centric.
This is a part of a paragraph from an -me document. .lp Let's look again at an $n$-bit integer $[ x sub n-1 , x sub n-2 , . . . , x sub 1 , x sub 0 ]$. It can be viewed as a bit vector $x vec$. One way to look at it is a binary number with $n$ digits. That is the .i unsigned interpretation of $x vec$: .EQ U({x vec}) = sum from i=0 to n-1 x sub i 2 sup i .EN It is translated using grohtml. groff -I. -I/home/zvezdan/share/tmac -Iimages/inforepr -Rpte \ -P'-s 10' -Thtml -me -mpdfmark >inforepr.html First, if I don't define -Iimages/inforepr all images are stored in my tmac directory (which should be really used by soelim only). Secondly, the HTML counterpart of the above paragraph looks like this: <p style="margin-top: 1em" valign="top"><small>Let’s look again at an <img src="images/inforepr-15.png" alt="Image images/inforepr-15.png"> -bit integer <img src="images/inforepr-16.png" alt="Image images/inforepr-16.png"> . It can be viewed as a bit vector <img src="images/inforepr-17.png" alt="Image images/inforepr-17.png"> . One way to look at it is a binary number with <img src="images/inforepr-18.png" alt="Image images/inforepr-18.png"> digits. That is the <i>unsigned</i> interpretation</small></p> <p style="margin-top: 1em" valign="top"><small>of <img src="images/inforepr-19.png" alt="Image images/inforepr-19.png"> :</small></p> <p style="margin-left:40%;"><small><i>U</i>( <i><small><small><small>→</small></small></small> x</i>)= <i><small><small>ni</small></small></i><small><small>−1=0</small></small></small> <big>Σ</big> <i><small><small>x <small><small>i</small></small></small></small></i> <small><small>2 <i><small><small>i</small></small></i></small></small></p> After this point all the letters are too small for comfortable reading. Questions: - This is not a too complicated paragraph, yet is it broken in two paragraphs at "interpretation</p> <p>of". Why? - Where five levels of <small> come from? (The document of 5 pages ends up with 7 <small> levels). Best regards, Zvezdan _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff