> I think, if you do that, this bit > > > .nr a \n(.j > > .ad l > > .nr i \n(.i > > .in +\w'\fBtroff 'u > > .ti \niu > > .B troff > > ought to turn into something like > > def SY > .nr a \n(.j > .ad l > .nr i \n(.i > .in +\w'\fB\\$1 'u > .ti \niu > .B \\$1 > .SY troff
Yep.
> That definition could then be re-used on other groff
Exactly.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
