M Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Since DocBook deduces _meaning_ from the presentation markup
DocBook does nothing of the sort. It's doclifter that does that.
> then I will claim
> that the correct path needs to be something like ...
> groff -man -> DocBook +-> HTML
> |
> +-> groff -man_extended
>
> where new meaning markup is inserted back into the source document form
> (assuming that foo.man_extended becomes the prefered edited file).
I think there would be very little point in this.
groff markup is presentation-level. It's good at that. If you try to
turn it into a structural markup, I predict you will get exactly the
results Bernd Warken already has -- you'll break non-groff viewers
without producing anything that's adequate as a structural
description.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
