On 04-Jul-06 Gabriel Diaz wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder what kind tricks you use to make big tables that goes beyond > the paper defined boundaries fit on the paper. > > How you mangae to fit them? Just changin the point size?
That, and other things! You can use the numeric flag to reduce the "blank space" (default = 3n) between columns. For example .TS l2 l2 l. where instaed of "2" you can have "1" or even (in extreme need) "0". However, with "0" there will be no space at all, so if entries will the width of the columns you will need vertical lines to separate them. You can also try (for text) setting a reduced inter-word space, setting the end-of=sentence space to 0, setting a slightly negative track-kerning (so the letters get a bit closer together), using the \W (if you're output is PostScript) to make the characters slightly narrower), etc. But these things can only make a small percentage difference (maybe up to 15%). You can also temporarily reduce the left margin (page offset) and increase the line length (which has the effect of reducing the right margin), so that the table goes outside the normal boundaries, but in a nice way. Another thing to think of doing is to set the table in landscape orientation, though this usually means you need to set aside a whole page for it. > I use the mm macro and in the tables i use the T{ T} to quote text. > But still i need to reduce it more. > > Any tips would be appreciated. If you could give us a clearer picture of the table layout and of the extent of excess, that might help to focus ideas. Best wishes, Ted. -------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 Date: 04-Jul-06 Time: 12:01:59 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff