> Here they are.
Thanks. Will check in soon.
> BTW. zapfdr.sed turned out to be a bad idea, since a couple of sed
> commands does not deserve a separate file.
??? This can't be correct! AFAIK, sed's `-f' option is portable
across all sed implementations. If you have found a counterexample
please report it here and to the autoconf people!
> PS. What happened to the script to make descriptions of the URW
> (and Adobe) fonts I have sent you?
This is in already in the CVS :-)
2006-04-30 Michail Vidiassov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* src/utils/afmtodit/afmtodit.pl: New option `-c' to add font
information as a comment in output.
* src/utils/afmtodit/afmtodit.man, NEWS: Document it.
> PPS. Filippov, the authour of Cyrillic extensions to URW fonts, may
> make one more beta this year, finally fixing compatibility problems
> with original URW fonts (source - private e-mail communication).
This is very good news!
> Do you keep an eye on the STIX fonnts project (www.stixfonts.org)?
No, I don't have time. It's probably best to wait until the TeX
people have done the right thing, then stealing their results.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
