> >> I see a difference in approaches. You are after metapost for
> >> groff (metapost pictures in groff document), while I am after
> >> groff for metapost (groff-made labels in metapost output).
> >
> > Exactly. Thus my remark to merge both approaches into a single
> > script. To make such a script user-friendly is probably the most
> > work...
>
> >> I want us to try to push groff support into the next metapost
> >> version.
What do you want the MetaPost people do?
> 1. Recognize that there are 2 users of troff labels in metapost.
:-)
> The scripts are user-friendly for us.
Mhmm, not really.
> Since I run metapost from make for the most time,
> running one more script is not a problem.
At least the options `--help' and `--version' should do something...
> (As I have already done with my previous patch to dmp, that
> enabled groff support, but did not jettison the remnants of the
> support for Ma Bell troff.
I think there are good chances that such patches are applied to the
MetaPost source files.
> BTW. I think the latter support was broken netertheless. Can you
> check?)
I can't. I don't have an old troff running.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
