Oops. Those Reply-to settings caught me out again, and I sent this privately to Werner, neglecting to cc the list :-(
Apologies, Werner, for the duplicate. Werner Lemberg wrote, quoting me: >>> Keith, what do you think of extending your pdfroff script >>> to emulate the creation of PDFs from EPS files (using >>> -dEPSCrop)? >> >> Maybe, rather than restrict things to just a few specific >> capabilities, provide a pdfroff option to pass arbitrary >> GhostScript options through to the back end postprocessor, >> (which of course, *is* GhostScript)? To avoid collisions >> with groff options, that should probably be a long form >> option. Any suggestions for a suitable name? > > Well, `--eps' sounds nice :-) Perhaps, as a specialised option for EPS handling; for a more generally useful option, to pass arbitrary GhostScript control settings, I think not. > This would basically mean a PDF with a single output page (or > a series of single-page PDF documents), with the PDF page size > equal to each page's bbox. Given that pdfroff follows troff's own model, with a single output stream appearing on `stdout', how would such a series of output documents be produced? I can understand the requirement for a PDF document to include EPS elements, but is there any real practical application for emitting what could more usefully be kept as EPS, just to prove that it can be represented as PDF? I'm reluctant to divert my limited time to something that may turn out to be no more than an esoteric proof of concept. Regards, Keith. _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
