Keith Marshall writes:
> It just seems strange that an autoconf managed project,
> which does not use automake, should rely on a tool which is distributed
> only with automake.
Yes, the automake and autoconf maintainers agree that the 'aclocal' program
would better fit into the autoconf package, rather than in the automake package.
The current packaging is a consequence of history.
If you mind using 'aclocal', you can of course also use a command
cat $(M4MACROS) > aclocal.m4
instead of
aclocal -I m4
Bruno
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
