> I have tested unicode support in groff and stepped over a bug
> (IMHO).
This should be fixed now in the CVS. Thanks for the report! Please
test.
> 3. Some other bugs:
>
> afmtodit needs a patch, since we do not encode variant glyphs with
> ps names smth.smth, but they may be present in kerning tables.
I can find a patch in your unicodetest bundle. Do you mean this one?
> BTW, why not to encode them as, say, uXXXX.cap
I will have to think about this.
> grops(1) tells
> A downloadable font should not include its own name in a
> %%DocumentSuppliedResources comment.
> But the FreeEuro font does not follow this convention.
Can you provide a patch?
> PS. Have you started to work on real Unicode input?
No, sorry. Still a lot of other things to do (and, admittedly, not
*that* much interest currently to start with this work). As usual,
volunteers welcome.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
