> The `XS', `XA' and `XE' macros collect the TOC entries into a > diversion, which is flushed when `TC' is called; to cover the entire > document, this has to come at the end. This is the way `ms' has > always worked, both in groff and traditional troff implementations
Just rank speculation, in the way of throwing out crazy ideas... Is there any merit to the idea of diverting an *entire* document and inserting a TOC in the right place just before printing the whole thing? -- Larry _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
