On 22/08/16 21:04, Adam Bartlett wrote:
Hello All,


Some of you might have known Gregoire , a notation tool originally written by someone from Solemnes IIRC. It has been long time dead, worked only on Windows XP. I just checked the website again, and now there seems to be a Windows 7 compatible version. I have not been able to test it yet. The website has sort of been hijacked, I remember in the past one could share documents there, but the link is empty now. Pity

http://gregoire.tele.free.fr/index.php

Herman Viaene


A week ago I attended the Gregorian Institute of Canada Colloquium in Toronto which was, among other things, dedicated to digital chant research technologies and to the legacy of one of its pioneers, Andrew Hughes.

Many scholars working in digital chant research technologies (including the Cantus Database, SIMSSA, among others) were present and the state of chant manuscript encoding and database development was discussed with an eye toward future goals and priorities.

A few of us in attendance were Gregorio users and promoters, though many of those doing strict academic research were unfamiliar with the platform and its encoding languages. A conversation began about the possibility of linking the work and encoding languages of Gregorio with some of these research efforts, many of which are well staffed and funded.

The conversations tended toward a technology called MEI <http://music-encoding.org/> (Music Coding Initiative) which the researchers believe can contain all of the needed information in chant manuscripts for effective querying, comparative analysis, etc. I know that I have made use of Gregobase, however, for effective research queries and tend to think that GABC, and, potentially, NABC are systematic and thorough enough to achieve the same goal. The group appears to see MEI as the right language for research while GABC / NABC are perhaps best for producing practical editions.

My question: I wonder if it might be possible to find a way to allow GABC / NABC to communicate and share data with MEI?

For those interested in research, the tools that the musicological community could bring to the table appear to be quite immense. It seems that a digital Paleography Workshop could be assembled quite quickly with these tools—with Gregobase and all of the work done by Cantus, among others, a firm foundation is already in place. Such an effort could help those among us who are interested in producing more critical performance editions of the chant—per the request of Sacrosanctum Concilum 117—to do so rather easily and even collaboratively.

Is anyone here interested in this idea? Or of collaborating with the Cantus group, or of finding ways to port GABC / NABC code over to databases for musicological research?

I would be curious to know the thoughts of the Gregorio community on these ideas.

Yours faithfully,
Adam Bartlett


_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users


--
Veel mensen danken hun goed geweten aan hun slecht geheugen. (G. Bomans)

Lots of people owe their good conscience to their bad memory (G. Bomans)

_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users

Reply via email to