Thanks Pamela, that's very helpful!   *starred*

On Dec 1, 12:57 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Stephen -
>
> It's a known issue - you can star it 
> here:http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/detail?id=178
>
> The notion of child blips in the API is a little bit made up -- it doesn't
> quite reflect the data model --but your understanding sounds reasonable.
>
> <http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/detail?id=178>-
> pamela
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Stephen George <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Anyone else finding that the Java API's Blip.getDocument
> > ().getInlineBlips() method never returns inline blips ?
>
> > Don't get me wrong... I can still explore those inline blips... but as
> > regular "children" of the containing wave.
>
> > My assumption was that that new blips of parallel level of the
> > previous blip were "children".  And that an indented reply blip that
> > is embedded in the middle of an existing blip would be considered and
> > "inline blip".
>
> > Instead my experience while handling the WAVELET_SELF_ADDED event has
> > been that ALL blips are reported as "children" and not inline.
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Wave API" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<google-wave-api%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.


Reply via email to