I believe that the list is moderated by [email protected]. And I disagree, I think that he's kept an open forum for discussion of the substance of the list.
See these waves: Google \/\/ave Extensions List - https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BVD_TspnyA Discussions: Google Wave Extensions List (2) - https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BP4hz2nAYA I think that you should reiterate your thoughts on the Discussions wave above. On Nov 30, 7:34 pm, qMax <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder who maintainshttp://sites.google.com/site/gwaveextensions/ > Are those extension verified somehow? > (to be opensourced, to be working, to be not malicious, to do not > contain obscene lexic in comments :), etc) > > Seems like the list contains alot of not ever developing extensions, > and alot of broken. > This also makes a sence, it helps to prevent starting the same work, > but it is just a garbage, if cannot join developement, check status of > developement, or contact author. > > I'd suggest to put mandatory link to sources of each extension > (making a frequired ield in submit form ) to solve all above issues at > once. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
