Hello All,

Have anyone experienced any similar behavior? Is there any robot
black-listing mechanism active in Wave? Do any of our thoughts make any
sense? We are not sure what's going on.

Maybe it has anything to do with this bug report:
http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/detail?id=494

Thanks.

--
http://blog.thewe.net
http://twitter.com/theWE_


On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Avital Oliver <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello friends,
>
> We are working on a mechanism for replication of portions of gadget states
> in different waves using robots. Basically, our robot responds to a
> BLIP_SUBMITTED event on one wave and sends one or more
> DOCUMENT_ELEMENT_MODIFY_ATTRS operations to one or more gadgets. We are
> writing our robot in Clojure without any of the APIs by manually generating
> the operation JSONs. Our robot is mostly working but we seem to be affected
> by several possible bugs and since we don't have logs from within the Wave
> server or the Robot Gateway it's making our debugging work somewhat
> difficult. All of our work has been done by verifying through the App Engine
> logs that the operations are being sent.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1. We seem to have learned that if an operation in sent with illegal JSON
> structure (for example sending null for operations.list instead of []) then
> that robot stops working, or perhaps stops working in the context of the
> wave it was trying to act on. Are we correct in this observation? Is there
> some defined state of a certain robot not being allowed to operate on a
> specific wave? When does this happen?
>
> 2. We think that if we send two distinct operations modifying the same
> gadget the operation doesn't happen and perhaps also then puts the robot in
> the "not working" mode (as described in issue 1). When we united the two
> operations into one operation it seems to be working. Is it true that this
> is the case or are we confusing several different issues into one?
>
> 3. As the complement of issue 2, we also have started to believe that you
> can't send any two DOCUMENT_ELEMENT_MODIFY_ATTRS operations in one bundle,
> even if it is to two different gadgets in different waves. When we sent only
> one such operation and maintained the second one to be sent as a response to
> the next DOCUMENT_CHANGED event it seemed like we got things to be working
> (but other things kept not working). Are we correct in our guessy
> observation?
>
> 3.1. This also may have to do with the fact that the two gadgets have the
> same URL (in two different waves). Could this be the cause of some of our
> problems?
>
> 4. We tried sending a DOCUMENT_ELEMENT_MODIFY_ATTRS operation with a null
> value and it did not delete the key (we assumed it might work this way
> because of the way submitDelta works in the gadget API). We also looked for
> a different operation type that might remove a key but couldn't find one.
> How can we delete a gadget key using a robot?
>
> Thanks,
> Avital and Ayal.
>
> --
> http://thewe.net
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Wave API" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-wave-api%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=.
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=.


Reply via email to