Barry! On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:23, Barry Hunter <[email protected]> wrote: > we have NO POSSIBLE WAY to know you did that. Unless you have another > thread, but its kind of rude to split a discussion without maintaining > a link between the threads.
Oy! Ouch. I intended no rudeness. I'd verified that I was passing floats, as you'd suggested. Then I noticed that I was loading the google scripts twice and thought that might make a difference -- loading the script once didn't make the problem go away, it just made it different. So I reported on that. > That's pretty much why a link is always asked for. Agreed. It's a reasonable first step to say "I've observed problem X -- has anyone else observed anything similar?" before posting a link. Since we've gone that route, a link might be helpful. See below. > (I suppose unless we find a way to hack into your computer, so we can > see your screen. But that is a bit OTT for a help forum) I'm honored that you're so invested in helping. A link is problematic: if you're asking for a standalone / minimum case app, that would take a LONG time to extract and test. The entire app is a large Ruby on Rails project, being developed for a client and isn't public. We could set you up with access to the app -- PM me if you want to go this route. Thanks! - ff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
