but this just proves the point -- end users dont always enter the perfect 
address, but the interpretation of such addresses should be just as good in 
v3 as it is in v2.  even if its ballpark by a couple turns, that is wayyyy 
preferable to miles off target the v3 gives.  the results should be 
identical, and for some reason v3 isnt able to cope the same way given the 
same malformed address.  there has to be some sort of fix or way around 
this? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/07fO_iYgJ88J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.

Reply via email to