New MIT study on AI replacing workers: In my opinion, the study
methodology is flawed, and the study is being interpreted incorrectly
by many observers
The study is being interpreted as saying that almost 12% of workers
could be be replaced by AI now. Actually, it's talking about specific
tasks not specific workers, and claims it is not predictive. I am not
convinced that it's underlying model is useful for analysis in this
area. I'm basically considering most of the stories I've seen about
this today to be largely clickbait. -L
- - -
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
[email protected] (https://www.vortex.com/lauren)
Lauren's Blog: https://lauren.vortex.com
Mastodon: https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren
Signal: By request on need to know basis
Founder: Network Neutrality Squad: https://www.nnsquad.org
PRIVACY Forum: https://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility
_______________________________________________
google-issues mailing list
https://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/google-issues
