I think the most plausible events are that various collections apis make it into the api as a “replacement” for the non type safe interface based ones.
> On Mar 18, 2021, at 11:20 AM, Kent Sandvik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm very dumb, but if you don't want to use generics or think they are bad > for the language, why can't you just ignore them and not use them? > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:07 AM Space A. <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since pro-generics ppl here are struggling to provide any evidence of >> existence of open and public discussion on the topic of dropping generics, I >> will do it myself. >> >> Here is it: >> https://groups.google.com/g/golang-nuts/c/LEEuJPOg0oo/m/-EZp3YSeBQAJ >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d8b96595-effe-4eed-898d-1c4e183189dbn%40googlegroups.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAHC_roGwVqqk9aiNv0h7Pa6XDDBWrr3HRBBMk9bHaZqjcrUG%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0868C2C5-A4D5-4D38-B0B6-D1E955EAF7A4%40ix.netcom.com.
