Your snotty attacks are duly noted. Says a lot about you. Find me an engineer that doesn’t build on the backs of others and I’ll show you a very poor engineer.
The collections api was provided along with the delivery of generics in Java for two main purposes: it dissuaded the proliferation of competing packages (Guava and Apache not with standing) to provide consistency in learning and usage and the code served as a reference example of how best to do generics as it was written by language experts intimately familiar with the design/implementation. > On Mar 16, 2021, at 7:22 AM, Jan Mercl <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:10 PM 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:05 PM Robert Engels <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Failure to provide a standard “collections” package would be a huge >>> mistake. It is certainly a top 3 reason for the success of Java. > > It would be probably a huge mistake to follow the views of anyone > constantly preaching Java in a Go mailing list. Sometimes with little > understanding of the rationale behind the differences. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/F68140CE-3D5B-4656-B499-64E4ED4BD573%40ix.netcom.com.
