hi Space,
i do not care about this discussion in general and learned to trust the
go developers to be thoughtful and reasonable.
i wouldn't write this normally, but in case you are not aware it might
actually help: i did read the last couple of your messages to this list
again and came to the conclusion that i would not want to enter into a
discussion with you based on the general tone of your messages,
regardless of argument or subject.
i don't mean any disrespect. the advice by Tyler is well meaning and
will certainly be good to follow generally and by everyone:
"I think your arguments would gain quite a bit more traction on this
list if you presented them in a more respectful way."
a good exercise would be to review your messages from a different point
of view. read them as if addressed to you and decide whether you would
want to reply yourself.
anyway, have a happy new year everyone!
On 31.12.20 13:55, Space A. wrote:
Hi,
ok, so please read it finally and tell which point exactly you think was
against CoC and in what of my messages and in which exact thread, but do
not put my words out of context. And explain why you responded just now,
and to my message to a person who obviously *violated* its terms by
aggressively turning to my personality.
Do you protect this aggressive behavior just because you pro-generics
and silently hate everything I will say (and me personally)? Because if
you do, it's quite stupid. But I hope it's not.
чт, 31 дек. 2020 г. в 07:51, Tyler Compton <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Space A,
So switching from subject to my personality and telling me what
I should and what shouldn't, to whom to listen, and what to read
is something in line with "code of conduct" which you appeal as
the argument of last resort?
I've seen how you carry yourself on this list, and you really should
read the code of conduct. I think your arguments would gain quite a
bit more traction on this list if you presented them in a more
respectful way.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:47 PM Space A. <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Nice.
> You should listen to people who have been doing this much
longer than you
Thanks, are you sure you know for how long I've been doing
*this* to be able to compare?
> before discarding all their points as "bullshit"
Have *you* actually read and listened because this is not what
I've said?
> and you should probably review the community code of conduct
So switching from subject to my personality and telling me what
I should and what shouldn't, to whom to listen, and what to read
is something in line with "code of conduct" which you appeal as
the argument of last resort?
This was actually my first comment on this particular topic. So
yea, I read and listened before replying. I could have replied
to everyone and explained in detail, but I value the time of my
opponents. And my own time, tbh.
чт, 31 дек. 2020 г. в 00:03, David Riley <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
This topic has shown little other than that a few people
here are unwilling to consider points of view other than
their own and declare that very real problems are not real.
You should listen to people who have been doing this much
longer than you have before discarding all their points as
"bullshit", and you should probably review the community
code of conduct.
If you've got nothing constructive to contribute, why bother?
- Dave
> On Dec 30, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Space A.
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> "runtime type-casting"
> "type safety something"
> "boilerplate"
> "amount of code"
> "benefit something"
> "greatly simplified" (for whom?)
>
> This topic has clearly shown that most people pro-generic
have no *real world* problems that they struggle to solve,
yet most of them don't even understand what *real world*
problems are.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTek6rrfmMziuj5poy4hAZJ%3DHXsyp-FB96RdUvZ%2BncoJYA%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTek6rrfmMziuj5poy4hAZJ%3DHXsyp-FB96RdUvZ%2BncoJYA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTeXFD8WoGeS4H1OwXnu5N0f-LqcUBGJmUYiCj3BWACkTA%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTeXFD8WoGeS4H1OwXnu5N0f-LqcUBGJmUYiCj3BWACkTA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/bb6925a2-b4c0-1adc-1ded-d00347ebab22%40mb0.org.
